tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3184990032979540229.post8176148193712299049..comments2023-10-25T09:49:43.089+01:00Comments on BEN'S PRISON BLOG - Lifer On The Loose: Pick Another Ruleprisonerbenhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14923205052778958118noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3184990032979540229.post-75736214559828519892011-08-01T10:58:45.372+01:002011-08-01T10:58:45.372+01:00Spend it on phone calls.
This whole saga is a huge...Spend it on phone calls.<br />This whole saga is a huge waste of my taxes: he's a threat only to the public image of the prison system and I don't think it's worth £50k a year to prevent him criticising them (which is what he'd do full-time if they let him out).Cirrocumulushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11357630236254664430noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3184990032979540229.post-74404894501814052962011-08-01T10:40:36.325+01:002011-08-01T10:40:36.325+01:00Surely they have to prove their suspicions have so...Surely they have to prove their suspicions have some grounds for their concerns? Methinks they are worried about what he could say.queenienoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3184990032979540229.post-40661487189563001822011-08-01T00:59:13.589+01:002011-08-01T00:59:13.589+01:00Take the word processor, stop the man writing open...Take the word processor, stop the man writing openly. Take rule 39 and tear it up - stop the man writing illicitly. Will there be a new PSI entitled 'stop prisoners writing'? Watch this space....Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3184990032979540229.post-43862869008373119992011-07-31T21:52:02.990+01:002011-07-31T21:52:02.990+01:00Prison Rule 39 says that legally privileged corres...Prison Rule 39 says that legally privileged correspondence can be opened, read or even stopped in 2 circumstances…(1) if gov has reasonable cause to believe that it contains an ‘illicit enclosure’ & (2) where gov has reasonable cause to believe that contents endanger prison security or the safety of others or are otherwise of a crim nature. Claims for misfeasance in public office have been tried and failed----three 2006 cases, at least one in the Lords, are on point here (Watkins; Woodin; Francis). Good luck<br /><br />I would think that by now in yr case the gov may find it less than impossible to establish reasonable cause. You have left a few hostages to fortune?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com