Tuesday, January 4, 2011

Help!

These two sentences often come out of the same mouths. Can anyone reconcile them?

"I believe in rehabilitation".

"Prisons should be harsh, unpleasant places".

20 comments:

  1. People hold contradictory ideas. That's why its always best to follow principals rather than individuals.

    ReplyDelete
  2. IMHO Its because the same tool (prison) is used to try and achieve 3 competing goals - the old revenge, deterring others and rehabilition. Hope the recent trouble in ford doesnt affect your chances of finally getting out... :) george

    ReplyDelete
  3. Not really because if the one person is saying both things they're usually the type who don't feel the urge to plug their brain into their mouth before opening it.

    ReplyDelete
  4. There is no excuse for that kind of ignorance from those in positions of power. The fact that 'harsh, unpleasant places' may well be the cause of 'criminality'(excuse the blanket) seems not to occur to these people.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I agree with Gaina, but would go a bit further and say that in my experience it would not be that uncommon to hear both statements coming from some prison officers. For example, it's noteworthy that the HMI report into Ford Cat D open prison specifically mentions the unhelpful attitude of some staff.

    ReplyDelete
  6. These are not contradictory. It's rooted in the belief that if (as an extreme example) prison involved daily beatings with a spiked cat o' nine tails followed by vinegar baths and salt rubs, then prisoners would be more likely to go straight in order to avoid ever going bach to such a regime.

    They're wrong (aren't they?) but not contradictory.

    ReplyDelete
  7. The two statements under 'Help' are contradictory and everyone has strange and contradictory ideas. That is in the realms of people and their ideas which is how this post is presented.

    As for how institutions like prisons are run, they probably do contain those two or (even three as g specified) elements.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Many prisoners are victims of abuse themselves, and turned to drugs/alchohol as a means of numbing their pain. Many have mental health issues, literacy problems, no family support etc etc. How are they ever going to develop and progress in a positive way, or change their ways in yet another 'harsh, unpleasant place'?. For many, they've known nothing else. Prisoners are individuals with different needs like the rest of us and should not be lumped together as though 'one size fits all'. It is tragic that despite all this some young people I've met still feel 'safer' inside than fending for themselves on the streets of our towns and cities.

    ReplyDelete
  9. The statements are not contradictory. On the one hand to rehabilitate is to give a prisoner the personal tools to handle ordinary non criminal life, which we desire of most of them, on the other it has to be a harsh unpleasant place so those who have not stooped to that level don't. After all if it was a push over where all your problems would be solved with no unpleasantness then many would want to opt out of the hard grind...

    That said, prison has many harsh realities regardless of regime, that people don't think off when they hear (wrongly for the most part) of prison perks, and that is the loss of liberty for a start.

    ReplyDelete
  10. It does seem common sense what you are saying here, but actually takes no account of the many cases of injustice that exist, Ben's being one. Also your own comment here is a bit of a contradiction too; that prison has to be a harsh unpleasant place and yet some people only hear of prison perks. Not only do people hold contradictory ideas, society itself is one big contradiction. Again, that's why it is best to follow and fight for basic principals like humanity and human dignity in all things

    ReplyDelete
  11. Ben's current position has nothing to do with prison being either harsh and unpleasant, nor a place of rehabilitation. He was rightly sent to prison, and rehabilitated himself. The reason why he is still there is not because prison is or isn't nice, it is because the bureaucracy is malign and perverse. He could be given breakfast in bed every day, a "companion" every night and the place made far more congenial, yet still be there because of the nature of the bureaucracy.

    ReplyDelete
  12. It is still true that there are gross mis carriages of justice. Some things I have heard about access to 'perks' in prison often prove it to be a thoroughly unjust and corrupt institution, just as life is here too for us on the outside, hence why some people (like the ones Jules referred to) might actually feel safer inside.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Ben is not the victim of a miscarriage of justice, in the sense that he definitely did kill someone, he got a reasonable sentence (life, the only one available) and a sensible "tariff" of 10 years. What he is a victim of is the way the state works, which is that you must comply with its idiosyncrasies and not the other way around or life becomes difficult. In his case this results in him being locked up for £800,000 longer than I as a tax payer would care to pay, and 20 years longer than he would like to serve, but in many walks of life where a bureaucracy is involved if you don't don't to their tune, they don't play. Is it corrupt? No, not in the sense that corruption is normally meant. Is is wrong and perverse? Absolutely.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Its not just a matter of the 'bureaucracy' ( by that do you mean 'management'?), but the whole rotten system, from when you are born until when you die, it is rotten to the core, the whole economics of it, not just that some bits of it are wrong and perverse, but everything is wrong. A bit of tweaking which involves changing high ranking personnel will do precious little. Cutting the dreaded 'bureaucracy' ( whatevs) might be and is currently meaning cuts to services and things people rely on and need. Ben and many others are victims of an unjust prison system and its reflective of the unjust nature of this society.

    ReplyDelete
  15. The bureaucracy is not just the nature of the management it is the nature of an all pervading attitude.

    You get it when "they" have a power over "you" but not when "you" have a power over "them".

    In short a complacent organisation that does not need your input is more likely to treat you badly compared to one which needs your custom. (Not always the case, but when you come across a small business that is bad and there are lots of alternatives you just go elsewhere).

    There is no way Ben can get a good service because he can't shop around. He can blog though and that kicks the system. For everyone outside, it is a matter of making sure there is enough competition and people know who is the boss.

    ReplyDelete
  16. The problem you say is an 'all pervading attitude' and the solution lies in competition and everyone knowing who is boss hmmmm, interesting, seems a bit of a circle to me, oh well, I'm off to bed now, goodnight.

    ReplyDelete
  17. What an interesting post, and ensuing discussion. The "system" is not fit for purpose, until joe public sees the benefit in rehabilitation as opposed to revenge, and the politicians not just tackling those issues which will win them votes, will we ever get the debate and reform we so badly need?, or the money to back it up?.

    ReplyDelete
  18. People can believe in rehabilitation and deterrence at the same time, surely?

    ReplyDelete
  19. @ Flynny

    They can support both, yes, but very few of them can come up with a plan that actually stands a chance of creating both. The simple reality is that unpleasant painful environments are not conducive to learning new coping skills and developing sophisticated moral reasoning; not saying it can't happen, just that it's less likely to. That being so, if you want to both rehabilitate and deter, you need to think of a deterrent besides making prison hell.

    ReplyDelete
  20. From an article in The Times of Malta today:

    A prisoner complaining about horrendous treatment, and many people commenting saying that this is what he deserves:

    http://www.timesofmalta.com/articles/view/20110106/local/prisoner-threatens-legal-action-over-horrendous-treatment

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.